Endram field guides

Agent security comparisons

Decision guides for gateways, proxies, authentication, authorization, security, governance, and build-versus-buy.

26 implementation pages4 sectionsUpdated September 2026

Named alternatives

01 · open policy agent alternatives

Open Policy Agent alternatives for AI agents

Open Policy Agent alternatives for AI agents: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
02 · auth0 alternatives

Auth0 alternatives for AI agent authorization

Auth0 authenticates users and issues tokens. If the reason you are looking for an alternative is agent tool calls, this explains which part you actually need to replace and which part you should keep.

Open guide →
03 · okta alternatives

Okta alternatives when the problem is agent access, not workforce login

Workforce identity, privileged access, and agent tool authorization solve different failures. This separates them so an evaluation does not end in a migration that leaves the original gap open.

Open guide →
04 · keycloak alternatives

Keycloak alternatives for teams adding AI agents

Keycloak gives you an authorization server you can run yourself. Where it gets thin for agents is per-call decisions, approvals, and evidence, and that is a different component rather than a different Keycloak.

Open guide →
05 · hashicorp vault alternatives

HashiCorp Vault alternatives for AI agent credentials

Vault decides which secret an agent may hold. It does not decide what the agent does with it. This separates the secrets problem from the action problem before you compare products.

Open guide →
06 · amazon verified permissions

Amazon Verified Permissions alternatives for agent tool calls

Verified Permissions evaluates Cedar policies for application authorization. Where it stops short for agents is arguments, approvals, and execution evidence, and this explains how the two layers fit together.

Open guide →
07 · xacml

XACML alternatives for agent and API authorization

XACML got the architecture right and the ergonomics wrong. This maps its concepts onto what teams use now, and what is worth carrying forward into agent authorization.

Open guide →

MCP architecture

01 · mcp gateway vs api gateway

MCP gateway vs API gateway

MCP gateway vs API gateway: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
02 · mcp proxy vs mcp gateway

MCP proxy vs MCP gateway

MCP proxy vs MCP gateway: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
03 · mcp authorization vs authentication

MCP authorization vs authentication

MCP authorization vs authentication: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
04 · mcp registry

MCP registry vs security gateway

MCP registry vs security gateway: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
05 · open source mcp servers

Open-source MCP servers vs managed control

Open-source MCP servers vs managed control: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
06 · best mcp gateway

Best MCP gateway: a buyer evaluation guide

Best MCP gateway: a buyer evaluation guide: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
07 · mcp gateway open source

Open-source vs managed MCP gateway

Open-source vs managed MCP gateway: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
08 · best mcp servers

Best MCP servers for production: security checklist

Best MCP servers for production: security checklist: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →

Engines and policy languages

01 · ai agent identity vs workload identity

AI agent identity vs workload identity

AI agent identity vs workload identity: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
02 · ai agent authentication vs authorization

AI agent authentication vs authorization

AI agent authentication vs authorization: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
03 · short lived credentials for ai agents

API keys vs short-lived agent credentials

API keys vs short-lived agent credentials: compare enforcement point, identity context, approvals, evidence, and operational fit before choosing an architecture.

Open guide →
04 · spicedb vs openfga

SpiceDB vs OpenFGA, and what neither one does for agents

Both implement Zanzibar-style relationship authorization. The comparison that matters for agent workloads is not which engine wins, it is which questions neither engine is being asked.

Open guide →
05 · opa vs cedar

OPA vs Cedar for agent authorization

Rego and Cedar make opposite trade-offs between expressiveness and analysability. This compares them on the axes that matter when the subject is an agent rather than a service.

Open guide →
06 · rbac vs abac

RBAC vs ABAC vs ReBAC for AI agent access

The three models compared on the question agents actually raise: can this model express a rule that depends on the arguments of one call, and what happens when it cannot.

Open guide →
07 · policy decision point

Policy decision point vs policy enforcement point for agent tool calls

The PDP and PEP split is decades old and still decides whether an agent control works. This is where each sits for a tool call, and the failure modes of putting them in the wrong place.

Open guide →

Build, buy, and operate